1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 369 F.3d
  5. 369 F.3d 1289 (2004)
 

INTERTOOL, LTD. v. TEXAR CORP.

No. 03-1394.

369 F.3d 1289 (2004)

INTIRTOOL, LTD. (doing business as Mass-Tex, Ltd.), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEXAR CORPORATION (doing business as ToolPro, Inc.), Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: May 10, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter D. Ames, Law Office of Walter D. Ames, of McLean, Virginia, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Lea H. Speed, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, of Memphis, Tennessee, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief was Robert B. Kennedy, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, of Atlanta, Georgia.

Before LOURIE, SCHALL, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

LINN, Circuit Judge.

In this patent infringement case, Intirtool, Ltd. ("Intirtool") appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Intirtool, Ltd. v. Texar Corp., No. 4:00cv118 (E.D.Tex. Mar. 31, 2003). The district court found that Intirtool's United States Patent No. 5,022,253 ("the '253 patent") was invalid for failure to satisfy the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph 1, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases