1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 860 A.2d
  5. 860 A.2d 764 (2004)
 

MURPHY v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF STAMFORD

No. 24231.

860 A.2d 764 (2004)

86 Conn.App. 147

Karen A. MURPHY et al. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE CITY OF STAMFORD et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided November 23, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen A. Murphy, pro se, and Kathleen A. Murphy, pro se, the appellants (plaintiffs).

John W. Mullin, assistant corporation counsel, for the appellees (defendants).

FOTI, BISHOP and McLACHLAN, Js.

FOTI, J.

The pro se plaintiffs, Karen A. Murphy and Kathleen A. Murphy, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their petition for a new trial. The court rendered summary judgment in favor of the defendants, the zoning board of appeals of the city of Stamford (board) and Stamford zoning enforcement officer, James J. Lunney III. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court improperly rejected their claim that a new trial was warranted on the basis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases