1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 848 A.2d
  5. 848 A.2d 770 (2004)
 

COMPARATO v. SCHAIT

848 A.2d 770 (2004)

180 N.J. 90

Richard COMPARATO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rochelle SCHAIT (formerly known as Comparato), Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 2, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia M. Barbarito, Denville, argued the cause for appellant (Einhorn, Harris, Ascher, Barbarito, Frost & Ironson, attorneys; Bonnie C. Frost, of counsel and on the brief).

Neil S. Braun, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent (Gomperts & Braun, attorneys; Mr. Braun and Priscilla A.J. Miller, on the brief).

Justice VERNIERO delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this matrimonial matter, plaintiff seeks to disqualify the trial judge as well as defendant's present and prior counsel, including an attorney who formerly served as the judge's law clerk. The trial court and Appellate Division each denied plaintiff's requested relief. We affirm, except that we modify the Appellate Division's judgment by directing that the former law clerk screen herself from any further involvement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases