L.M.E. v. A.R.S.

Docket No. 242681.

680 N.W.2d 902 (2004)

261 Mich. App. 273

L.M.E. and Family Independence Agency, Petitioners-Appellants, v. A.R.S., Respondent-Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Decided March 16, 2004, at 9:10 a.m.

Released for Publication June 8, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl J. Marlinga, Prosecuting Attorney, and Joseph F. Dillard, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the petitioners.

Peter L. Conway, Lapeer, and Patrick A. Keenan, Detroit, for the respondent.

Before: OWENS, P.J., and SCHUETTE and BORRELLO, JJ.


OWENS, P.J.

Petitioners appeal as of right from the order denying their motion for child support and dismissing the case with prejudice. Petitioners contend that the trial court erred by concluding that LME was not entitled to child support because the child was conceived as a result of her criminal action in having sexual relations with respondent when he was a fourteen-year-old boy. The purpose of child support is to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases