The court responded meaningfully to the jury note which requested the definition of second- and third-degree robbery. Contrary to defendant's claim, the court was not required to repeat its definition of "deprive" and "appropriate," which it had already given in its main charge, and which the jury did not request in its note (see People v Allen,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. TORRES
4 A.D.3d 153 (2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 642
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ISAAC TORRES, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 17, 2004.
February 17, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
