PANETTA v. PANETTA


851 A.2d 720 (2004)

370 N.J. Super. 486

Anthony PANETTA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carolyn PANETTA, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 1, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nancy C. Ferro, Ridgewood, argued the cause for appellant (Ferro and Ferro, attorneys; Ms. Ferro, of counsel and on the brief).

Allen Hantman, Denville, argued the cause for respondent (Morris & Hantman, attorneys; Mr. Hantman, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, ALLEY and PARKER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PARKER, J.A.D.

In this post-judgment matrimonial matter, we focus on two issues: the appropriate formula for calculating the marital share of plaintiff's federal pension and whether plaintiff is entitled to an offset against defendant's share of his pension for defendant's social security benefits.1

The parties were married in 1958 and divorced...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases