1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 863 A.2d
  5. 863 A.2d 704 (2004)
 

STATE v. BOSEMAN

No. 24061.

863 A.2d 704 (2004)

87 Conn.App. 9

STATE of Connecticut v. Matthew BOSEMAN.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided December 17, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric D. Coleman, Hartford, for the appellant (defendant).

John A. East III, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were James E. Thomas, state's attorney, and Adam B. Scott, assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

LAVERY, C.J., and FLYNN and WEST, Js.

FLYNN, J.

The defendant, Matthew Boseman, appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding him in violation of the conditions of and revoking his probation pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) he was denied due process of law because he lacked notice sufficient to warn him that the conditions of his probation proscribed the specific conduct alleged to have placed him in violation, (2) there was insufficient evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases