1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 10 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 10 Cal.Rptr.3d 146 (2004)
 

IN RE MARRIAGE OF CROSBY & GROOMS

No. A100718.

10 Cal.Rptr.3d 146 (2004)

116 Cal.App.4th 201

In re the MARRIAGE OF Susan R. CROSBY AND Jack F. GROOMS. Susan R. Crosby, Plaintiff, v. Jack F. Grooms, Defendant and Appellant; County of Humboldt, Intervener and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

February 26, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dalton & Bicknell, Donald W. Bicknell, Eureka, Robin N. McStay, for Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, James M. Humes, Sr. Asst. Attorney General, Frank S. Furtek, Lead Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Mary Dahlberg, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.

KLINE, P.J.

Jack Grooms appeals after the trial court ordered his child support obligation modified. Grooms, who resides in California, contends the trial court erred in using California law to modify an Idaho child support order because federal and state law and the choice of law provision in the parties' marital settlement agreement require that Idaho law be applied in modifying the support order, even though the parties no longer live in Idaho. In the alternative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases