The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence that despite the agency's diligent efforts, respondent missed many visits with the child, failed to attend planning conferences, failed to complete parenting skills and anger management classes, and, in violation of a court order, failed to quit smoking despite the child's special medical need that he do so (Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [c]; see Matter of Sheila G.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN THE MATTER OF PEARL
13 A.D.3d 141 (2004)
786 N.Y.S.2d 470
In the Matter of PEARL M.A., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. HAROLD A., Appellant; FAMILY SUPPORT SYSTEMS UNLIMITED, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 14, 2004.
December 14, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
