1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 683 N.W.2d
  5. 683 N.W.2d 855 (2004)
 

DOUGHERTY v. STATE FARM MUT. INS. CO.

No. A03-1866.

683 N.W.2d 855 (2004)

Sheryl L. DOUGHERTY, Respondent, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 27, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven R. Schwegman, Mary B. Mahler, Quinlivan & Hughes, P.A., St. Cloud, MN, for appellant.

Timothy W. Nelson, Nelson Personal Injury Attorneys, St. Cloud, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by WILLIS, Presiding Judge, HUDSON, Judge, and CRIPPEN, Judge.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.*

Appealing the district court's final judgment in this insurance dispute, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company disputes the court's conclusion that respondent's voluntary intoxication was not an event of independent significance, that is, conduct that broke the causative tie between injuries she sustained and her use of a motor vehicle. Appellant also...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases