1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 386 F.3d
  5. 386 F.3d 1133 (2004)
 

ON-LINE TECH. v. BODENSEEWERK PERKIN-ELMER

No. 04-1291.

386 F.3d 1133 (2004)

ON-LINE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BODENSEEWERK PERKIN-ELMER GMBH, Perkin-Elmer Corp., Perkin-Elmer Inc., Sick UPA GMBH, and Sick, A.G., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: October 13, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gabriel Berg, Berg & Androphy, of New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Edward T. Colbert, Kenyon & Kenyon, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was C. Kyle Musgrove. Of counsel on the brief were Francis H. Morrison III and Jonathan B. Tropp, Day, Berry & Howard LLP, of Hartford, CT.

Before MICHEL, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

The dispute in this case involves a device known as a long-path gas cell, which is used in an infrared spectrometer to determine the composition of gases such as emissions from industrial plants. The spectrometer captures the gas to be tested and directs a beam of infrared light through the chamber containing the gas. After the light has passed through the chamber, a detector measures the absorption of the light, from which the properties of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases