1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 374 F.3d
  5. 374 F.3d 1142 (2004)
 

SEARFOSS v. PIONEER CONSOL. CORP.

No. 03-1606.

374 F.3d 1142 (2004)

Marlane C. SEARFOSS and Timothy K. Searfoss, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PIONEER CONSOLIDATED CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 6, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Artz, Artz & Artz, of Southfield, MI, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Of counsel were John S. Artz and Robert P. Renke.

Thomas E. Bejin, Young & Basile, P.C., of Troy, MI, argued for defendant-appellee. Of counsel on the brief was Thomas N. Young.

Before NEWMAN, MICHEL, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Marlane and Timothy Searfoss (collectively "Searfoss") appeal from an order granting summary judgment of non-infringement to Pioneer Consolidated Corporation ("Pioneer") based on a finding that no reasonable jury could find that Pioneer's accused products infringe the claims of United States Patent No. 5,031,955 ("the '955 patent") under the doctrine of equivalents, the sole type of infringement asserted. Searfoss v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases