DiIORIO v. STRUCTURAL STONE & BRICK


845 A.2d 658 (2004)

368 N.J. Super. 134

Felice DiIORIO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. STRUCTURAL STONE & BRICK CO., INC., Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and Two J Development Corp., Jerold A. Hurwitz and Western Carolina Stone Center And Supply, Inc., Third-Party Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 2, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin J. Conyngham, Saddle Brook, argued the cause for appellant (Zimmerer, Murray & Conyngham, attorneys; Mr. Conyngham, on the brief).

James J. Savage, argued the cause for respondent (Scarpone Staiano & Savage, attorneys; Mr. Savage, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, CIANCIA and R.B. COLEMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by R.B. COLEMAN, J.A.D.

We granted leave to defendant Structural Stone & Brick Company (Structural Stone) to appeal from the October 16, 2002, interlocutory order of the Law Division, Morris County, denying its motion for summary judgment. At issue is whether the claims asserted by plaintiff Felice DiIorio for economic losses arising out of the deterioration of the stone façade of his residence are governed by the four...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases