Charles E. MURPHY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL, INC., a Wisconsin Corporation; Trane Company, a Wisconsin corporation; American Standard Inc., a Delaware Corporation; and Schneider Specialized Carriers, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted September 9, 2003.
Filed November 21, 2003.
Amended March 22, 2004.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Montgomery W. Cobb, Cobb & Bossé, LLP, Portland, OR, for the plaintiff-appellant.
Wade R. Kennon, The Gilroy Law Firm, P.C., Portland, OR, for defendant-appellee Schneider.
James N. Westwood, Leta E. Gorman, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, OR, for defendant-appellee Trane.
Before: ALDISERT, HALL, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
ORDER
The opinion published at 349 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir.2003) is amended to add the following footnote at the end of the second sentence in Part III.C:
A forum non conveniens motion, as opposed to a motion to transfer based on 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), is appropriate in this case because, if the forum selection clause is enforced, Murphy will be forced to litigate against Schneider in a Wisconsin state court, rather...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.