The order denying the motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed. The initial brief filed in this appeal raises claims that were not presented in the motion below. Affirmance is without prejudice for appellant to raise these claims by proper motion in the trial court. See Penrod v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HOLMES v. STATE
No. 4D04-711.
869 So.2d 622 (2004)
Earl L. HOLMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 17, 2004.
Rehearing Denied April 26, 2004.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Earl Holmes, Okeechobee, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.