1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 319 F.Supp.2d
  5. 319 F.Supp.2d 1166 (2004)
 

MATTHEWS v. XEROX CORP.

No. CIV.02-CV-2339-WQH.

319 F.Supp.2d 1166 (2004)

John E. MATTHEWS, Plaintiff, v. XEROX CORPORATION, a New York Corporation; Hewitt Associates, LLC, an Illinois business entity; Xerox Income Retirement Guarantee Plan and Does 2 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

April 23, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. Melissa Johnson, Law Office of Morgan JC Scudi, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff.

Daniel W. Kelsberg, Walsh and Furcolo, San Diego, CA, Richard J. Pautler, Patricia A. Winchell, Thompson Coburn, St Louis, MO, for Defendants.

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HAYES, District Judge.

Defendants Xerox Corporation, The Xerox Income Retirement Guarantee Plan, and Hewitt Associates, LLC (collectively "Defendants") move this Court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for summary judgment in their favor. On March 25, 2004, this Court heard the parties oral arguments and now issues the following amended order.1

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases