ROCKEL v. CHERRY HILL DODGE


847 A.2d 621 (2004)

368 N.J. Super. 577

Heather L. ROCKEL, Leonard E. Krwawecz, Aaron Stuart and William J. Hoelzel, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHERRY HILL DODGE, Defendant-Respondent, and Dave Smith, Joel Beswick and Mike Salte, Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 13, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Riley & Sandilos, attorneys for appellants (Charles N. Riley, of counsel and on the brief).

Kenney & Kearney, attorneys for respondent (Laura D. Ruccolo, Cherry Hill, of counsel; David W. Haworth, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, COBURN and C.S. FISHER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FISHER, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs commenced this action, claiming that the unconscionable sales practices of defendant Cherry Hill Dodge, in violation of the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -106, induced them to purchase or lease motor vehicles. Defendant moved for dismissal, contending that plaintiffs agreed to arbitrate these disputes. The trial judge granted that motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases