1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 13 A.D.3d
  5. 13 A.D.3d 131 (2004)
 

MELNITZKY v. NATHANSON

13 A.D.3d 131 (2004)

785 N.Y.S.2d 688

MICHAEL MELNITZKY, Appellant, v. EUGENE NATHANSON, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 9, 2004.

The malpractice claim that defendant attorney's conduct was the "but for" cause of plaintiff's losses was speculative (see Alter & Alter v Cannella, 284 A.D.2d 138, 139 [2001]), it reflected nonactionable strategic choices (see Iocovello v Weingrad & Weingrad, 4 A.D.3d 208 [2004]), and, as to the claimed failure to plead defamation, was entirely conclusory (see Gonzalez v Lombardino...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases