SUSSMAN v. MERMER


862 A.2d 572 (2004)

373 N.J. Super. 501

Stanley J. SUSSMAN and Marcy B. Sussman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert Wayne MERMER and Mary Mermer, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 21, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark J. Molz, Hainesport, argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Molz, attorney; Stephen Cristal, on the brief).

Donald Caruthers, III, Marlton, argued the cause for respondents (Styliades, Jackson and Dimeo, attorneys; Mr. Caruthers, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, PARRILLO and GRALL.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

PARRILLO, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Stanley J. Sussman, appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his personal injury negligence complaint against defendants, Robert and Mary Mermer.2 We reverse and remand, finding a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendant-homeowners' conduct breached the standard of care.

Viewing the evidence most favorably to plaintiff, R. 4:46...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases