CLARK v. SAFETY-KLEEN CORP.


845 A.2d 587 (2004)

179 N.J. 318

Stanley CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAFETY-KLEEN CORP., a New Jersey Corporation, Defendant-Respondent, and John Doe I, a fictitious person; and XYZ Corporation, a fictitious entity, Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided April 8, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary F. Piserchia, Marlton, argued the cause for appellant (Parker, McCay & Criscuolo, attorneys; Stacy L. Moore, Jr., on the briefs).

John L. Slimm, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for respondent (Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, attorneys).


Justice LONG delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this products liability case, the sole issue before us is whether the expert testimony adduced by plaintiff fell within the witness's sphere of expertise. The Appellate Division held that it did not and invalidated a jury verdict in plaintiff's favor. That conclusion too narrowly interpreted our decisions in Rubanick v. Witco Chemical Corp., 125 N.J...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases