1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 383 F.3d
  5. 383 F.3d 1036 (2004)
 

IN RE BROOKS

Nos. 03-5047 to 03-5050, 03-5057.

383 F.3d 1036 (2004)

IN RE: Phillip A. BROOKS, Petitioner.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided September 14, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Luskin argued the cause for petitioners. On the petitions for writ of mandamus and reply were Amy Berman Jackson, John Thorpe Richards, Jr., Elizabeth Wallace Fleming, Michael D. Goodstein, Deanna Chang, William H. Briggs, Jr., Marc E. Rindner, Hamilton P. Fox, III, Gregory S. Smith, Thomas E. Wilson, Bradley S. Lui, Dwight Bostwick, and Melissa McNiven.

G. William Austin, III argued the cause for respondents. With him on the response were Dennis M. Gingold, Elliott H. Levitas and Keith Harper.

Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge GINSBURG.

GINSBURG, Chief Judge:

Before us are five petitions for writs of mandamus filed by 11 current and former officials and employees of the Departments of the Interior (DOI) and of Justice. Each of the petitioners was the subject of an investigation, initiated by the district court, to determine whether that individual should be ordered to show cause why he or she should not be held in contempt for conduct relating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases