1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 325 F.Supp.2d
  5. 325 F.Supp.2d 1087 (2004)
 

HAMILTON v. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

No. ED CV 00-107-RT.

325 F.Supp.2d 1087 (2004)

La France HAMILTON, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California, Eastern Division.

July 7, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin E. Wizner, Mark D. Rosenbaum, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, Joe H. Freeman, III, Robert A. Seeman, Freeman & Associates, Burbank, CA, for Plaintiff.

Christopher D. Lockwood, Joseph Arias, Arias Lockwood & Gray, James F. Penman, Robert L. Simmons, San Bernardino City Attorneys Office, San Bernardino, CA, for Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LA FRANCE HAMILTON'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AS TO THE FOURTH CLAIM IN HIS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

TIMLIN, District Judge.

The court, Judge Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered plaintiff La France Hamilton ("Plaintiff")'s motion for summary adjudication ("motion") pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) ("Rule 56") as to the fourth claim in his second amended complaint ("SAC");1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases