1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 850 A.2d
  5. 850 A.2d 548 (2004)
 

VAN WINKLE v. NEW JERSEY D.O.C

850 A.2d 548 (2004)

370 N.J. Super. 40

Charles P. VAN WINKLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 16, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey E. Fogel, argued the cause for appellant.

Tamara L. Rudow, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General, attorney; Patrick DeAlmeida, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel; Ms. Rudow, on the brief).

Before Judges NEWMAN, PARRILLO and HOENS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

NEWMAN, J.A.D.

Petitioner Charles Van Winkle appeals from a decision of respondent Department of Corrections (D.O.C.) denying him work credits for the period of time he was incarcerated in Pennsylvania serving concurrent Pennsylvania and New Jersey sentences. We now reverse.

On February 11, 1978, petitioner began serving a seventeen and one-half to thirty-five year...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases