1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 338 F.Supp.2d
  5. 338 F.Supp.2d 1037 (2004)
 

IN RE NASH FINCH CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION

No. 02-CV-4736 JMRFLN.

338 F.Supp.2d 1037 (2004)

In re NASH FINCH CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION This document relates to: All Actions

United States District Court, D. Minnesota.

October 6, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher P. Seefer, Connie M. Cheung, Reed R. Kathrein, Lerach Coughlin Stoia & Robbins, San Francisco, CA, Darren J. Robbins, Randall H. Steinmeyer, William S. Lerach, Lerach Coughlin Stoia & Robbins, San Diego, CA, Garrett D. Blanchfield, Jr., Reinhardt Wendorf & Blanchfield, St. Paul, MN, Paul J. Geller, Geller Rudman, Boca Raton, FL, Vernon Jay Vander Weide, Head Seifert & Vander Weide, Mpls., MN, for Plaintiffs.

Andrew S. Hansen, Bret A. Puls, Heidi A. O. Fisher, Michael J. Bleck, Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly, Mpls., MN, for Defendants.

ORDER

ROSENBAUM, Chief Judge.

The Court dismissed this case on June 22, 2004. Plaintiffs now move for reconsideration, asking the Court to vacate its judgment and grant leave to amend the complaint, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 15.

This motion is a knowing sophistry. Plaintiffs know there is no basis for the Court to amend or alter the judgment; they simply want the Court to reconsider its decision denying leave to amend...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases