JORDAN v. EMPLOYMENT DEPT.

03-AB-1637; A122323.

97 P.3d 1273 (2004)

195 Or. App. 404

Cyndee J. JORDAN, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and Lomas Financial Services, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 22, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Oberdorfer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Oberdorfer Law Firm LLC.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General argued the cause for respondent, Employment Department. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

No appearance for respondent Lomas Financial Services.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM and SCHUMAN, Judges.


SCHUMAN, J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of an Employment Appeals Board (EAB) decision that disqualified her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she was fired for misconduct. According to claimant, the EAB failed adequately to defer to the rule interpretation declared by the authorized representative of the Employment Department (department). We affirm.

The EAB found the following facts, and claimant does not challenge them on review....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases