1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 593 S.E.2d
  5. 593 S.E.2d 776 (2004)
 

PINTACUDA v. ZUCKEBERG

No. 509A03.

593 S.E.2d 776 (2004)

358 N.C. 211

Jay T. PINTACUDA and wife Lucretia Pintacuda v. Jack ZUCKEBERG.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 2, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roberts & Stevens, P.A., by Jacqueline D. Grant and Kenneth R. Hunt, Asheville, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Van Winkle, Buck, Wall, Starnes, & Davis, P.A., by Dale A. Curriden and Vaughn S. Monroe, Asheville, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

As to the issue on direct appeal, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion. Further, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to the additional issues was improvidently allowed.

REVERSED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases