HANNIGAN v. HINTON

G-60251; A117147.

97 P.3d 1256 (2004)

195 Or. App. 345

Frank HANNIGAN and Dorothy Hannigan, Petitioners, v. Patricia HINTON, David Hinton and Department of Water Resources, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 15, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A.J. Schmeits argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Silven, Schmeits & Vaughan, Baker City.

Denise G. Fjordbeck, Salem, argued the cause for respondent Department of Water Resources. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

No appearance for respondents David Hinton and Patricia Hinton.

Richard M. Stephens and Groen Stephens & Klinge LLP, Bellevue, WA, filed the brief amicus curiae for Eastern Oregon Mining Association.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and ORTEGA, Judges.


ORTEGA, J.

Petitioners seek review of a final order of the Director of the Oregon Water Resources Department (the director) cancelling petitioners' water rights on the basis of nonuse. Three questions are before us: (1) whether water rights for mining may be lost by forfeiture under ORS 540.610, or may be lost only by application of a common-law abandonment theory, as argued by petitioners; (2) whether use of water at a place different from that designated on the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases