JOHNSON v. WATTENBARGER

No. 02-3707.

361 F.3d 991 (2004)

Raymond JOHNSON and Robert Johnson, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lee WATTENBARGER and Ruth Wattenbarger, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided March 22, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond Johnson (submitted), pro se, Kenosha, WI, Robert A. Johnson, pro se, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

William T. Rodeghier, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before EASTERBROOK, MANION, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.


EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

All too often both litigants and judges disregard their first duty in every suit: to determine the existence of subject-matter jurisdiction. In this litigation, by contrast, the defendants and judge were alert to jurisdiction and endeavored to apply the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Unfortunately, the judge waited until two years after the case began and the resolution of several claims on the merits had cut down the stakes. Because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases