1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 84 P.3d
  5. 84 P.3d 1262 (2004)
 

STATE v. TANDECKI

Nos. 51415-6-I, 51575-6-I.

84 P.3d 1262 (2004)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Daniel John TANDECKI, Appellant. State of Washington, Respondent, v. Nicolas Andres Pettitt, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

March 1, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Koch, Nielsen, Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Erin E. Ehlert, King Co. Pros. Atty's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

BAKER, J.

In these appeals we are called upon to determine whether the term "immediately" is an essential element of the crime of attempting to elude a pursuing police vehicle.1 We conclude that it is not. We further conclude that the use of a charging document which did not use the word "immediately" did not prejudice either appellant.

Nicolas Pettitt also argues that the jury's discussion of their personal experiences and opinions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases