1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 98 P.3d
  5. 98 P.3d 1246 (2004)
 

CASEY v. CHAPMAN

No. 51263-3-I.

98 P.3d 1246 (2004)

Daniel A. CASEY, Appellant, v. James D. CHAPMAN and Charles W. Binford, Jr., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

As Amended October 25, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Keller McInerney, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Kevin P. Hanchett, Lasher Holzapfel Sperry & Ebberson, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.

COX, C.J.

The primary issue that we decide is the nature of the interest that a successful bidder at a UCC foreclosure sale of a partnership interest acquires at the sale. Governing law generally restricts the rights of an assignee of a partnership interest to profits, not management or voting rights.1 Here, there is no agreement by all the partners of the partnership that either the original assignee of the partnership interest or the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases