1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 845 A.2d
  5. 845 A.2d 498 (2004)
 

GOODRIDGE v. HYSTER CO.

No. 268,2003.

845 A.2d 498 (2004)

Harold GOODRIDGE and Stephanie Goodridge, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants. v. HYSTER COMPANY, NAACO Material Handling Group, Inc., Defendants Below, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: April 2, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary W. Aber, Aber, Goldlust, Baker & Over, Wilmington, for appellant.

David E. Moore, Potter Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, Dennis P. Ziemba (argued), Lavin, Coleman, O'Neil, Ricci, Finarelli & Gray, Philadelphia, pro hac vice, for appellees.

Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, HOLLAND, STEELE, JACOBS, and HARTNETT.

STEELE, Justice:

The plaintiffs, Harold and Stephanie Goodridge sued Hyster Company, NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc., Modern Group, Ltd. and Modern Handling Equipment Co. to recover damages resulting from an injury sustained in a forklift accident at Harold's workplace.1 Defendants successfully moved in limine to bar the expert testimony of plaintiffs' only identified expert witness...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases