1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 13 A.D.3d
  5. 13 A.D.3d 120 (2004)
 

PEOPLE v. MUHAMMAD

13 A.D.3d 120 (2004)

787 N.Y.S.2d 8

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RASHID MUHAMMAD, Appellant. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEFFREY BROOKS, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 9, 2004.

The court properly exercised its discretion in excluding evidence of a 911 call, since it failed to qualify as an excited utterance because of the lack of evidence of the agitated or stressed condition of the declarant (see People v Johnson, 1 N.Y.3d 302, 306 [2003]; People v Vasquez, 88 N.Y.2d 561, 574-575 [1996]), and since it failed to qualify as a present sense impression because of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases