There was overwhelming evidence of an account stated for plaintiff's invoiced fees for professional accounting services. The trial court exercised its discretion appropriately in denying defendants' request for an adjournment after they had rested, in order to call an additional unidentified witness to impeach the "surprise" testimony of their own principal witness, since such testimony was the result of their own unpreparedness (cf. Halloran v Spina Floor Covering
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LES S. THOMPSON & CO., LLP. v. LUCILLE MURRAY CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC.
13 A.D.3d 120 (2004)
785 N.Y.S.2d 690
LES S. THOMPSON & CO., LLP, Respondent, v. LUCILLE MURRAY CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 9, 2004.
December 9, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
