SO. PLAINFIELD v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY


859 A.2d 463 (2004)

372 N.J. Super. 410

SOUTH PLAINFIELD PROPERTIES, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PLANNING BOARD, Defendant-Appellant, and Township Committee of Piscataway, Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 20, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Clifford Gibbons, Princeton, argued the cause for appellant (Maselli Warren, attorneys; Mr. Gibbons, of counsel and on the brief).

William J. O'Hagan, Jr., Neptune, argued the cause for respondent (Stout & O'Hagan, attorneys; Mr. O'Hagan, of counsel; Michael V. Elward, on the brief).

Before Judges STERN, WECKER and S.L. REISNER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

WECKER, J.A.D.

Defendant, Middlesex County Planning Board (County Planning Board), appeals from a summary judgment entered September 17, 2003, deeming the Board to have granted its approval, pursuant to the automatic approval provision of N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7 and Middlesex County Site Plan Resolution § 11-5, to the major site plan development application filed by plaintiff, South Plainfield Properties, L...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases