1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 371 F.3d
  5. 371 F.3d 950 (2004)
 

INGRAM v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH

No. 03-3088.

371 F.3d 950 (2004)

Sonia INGRAM, et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., et al., Respondents-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided June 15, 2004.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied July 12, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Plotkin (argued), Plotkin Law Firm, Chicago, IL, for Petitioners-Appellants.

Mark S. Dichter (argued), Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Philadelphia, PA, Jerold S. Solovy, Jenner & Block, Thomas E. Johnson, Anne M. Davis (argued), Johnson, Jones, Snelling, Gilbert & Davis, Barry S. Alberts (argued), Schiff, Hardin & Waite, Chicago, IL, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before EASTERBROOK, KANNE, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied July 12, 2004.1

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from an action filed in 1996 which became a class action representing over 900 female financial consultants of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. ("Merrill Lynch"), alleging gender-based discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and a host of common law claims. The parties eventually agreed to settle...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases