VISION-EASE LENS, INC. v. ESSILOR INTERN. SA

No. CIV.04-2663 RHK/AJB.

322 F.Supp.2d 991 (2004)

VISION-EASE LENS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL SA, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota.

June 10, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jake M. Holdreith and Kimberly G. Miller, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for Plaintiff.

Charles P. Baker, Nina Shreve, Donald J. Curry and Marc J. Pensabene, Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, New York, New York; Karl L. Cambronne, Chestnut & Cambronne, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KYLE, District Judge.

Introduction

Preliminary relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 65 is a "drastic and extraordinary remedy that is not to be routinely granted." Intel Corp. v. ULSI Sys. Tech. Inc., 995 F.2d 1566, 1568 (Fed.Cir.1993). Plaintiff Vision-Ease Lens, Inc. ("Vision-Ease") seeks a preliminary injunction against Defendants Essilor International SA and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases