1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 14 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 14 Cal.Rptr.3d 117 (2004)
 

LOVEJOY v. AT & T CORP.

No. C043320.

14 Cal.Rptr.3d 117 (2004)

119 Cal.App.4th 151

Robert LOVEJOY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AT & T CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

June 3, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark C. Barulich for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Watson, Khachadourian & Iams and Kevin R. Iams for Defendant and Respondent.

MORRISON, J.

Robert Lovejoy, individually and doing business as Lovejoy Drilling, filed a lawsuit alleging that AT & T Corporation had changed his telephone service to a toll-free 800 number without his permission and hid that fact from him, a practice known as "slamming." He further alleged that as a result he lost his business. In Lovejoy v. AT & T Corp. (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 85,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases