ROEHRDANZ v. BRILL

No. CX-03-137.

682 N.W.2d 626 (2004)

George M. ROEHRDANZ, Appellant, v. Toby BRILL, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 15, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David F. Herr, Laurie A. Kindel, Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP, George M. Roehrdanz, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant.

Andrew D. Parker, Ryan P. Winkler, Smith Parker, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, for Respondent.

William M. Hart, Damon L. Highly, Meagher & Geer, PLLP, Galen Robinson, Legal Aid Society of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN, for amicus Legal Aid Society of Minneapolis.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.


OPINION

MEYER, Justice.

We are asked to decide the proper method for service of a demand to remove a conciliation court action to district court. The court of appeals held that service by mail of a demand for removal to district court is not effective unless the responding party returns an acknowledgment of service as required by Minn. R. Civ. P. 4.05. We reverse and hold that a party appealing a conciliation court judgment may effectively serve a demand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases