1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 89 P.3d
  5. 89 P.3d 1213 (2004)
 

SABADOS v. KEMPA

03-0002-Z0; A120768.

89 P.3d 1213 (2004)

193 Or. App. 290

Diana Lynn SABADOS, Respondent, v. Roderick John KEMPA, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 28, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick S. Melendy, Cottage Grove, filed the brief for appellant. With him on the brief was Ackley Melendy & Kelly, LLP.

No appearance for respondent.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN and ORTEGA, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the entry of a final stalking protective order of unlimited duration. ORS 30.866(1) (2001).1 He argues that the evidence is not sufficient to support such an order under the requirements of the statute and, alternatively, that the order is too broad in scope because it does not take into account chance encounters between respondent and himself. We review de novo, giving deference to the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases