1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 365 F.3d
  5. 365 F.3d 926 (2004)
 

MONTGOMERY v. CITY OF ARDMORE

No. 01-7154.

365 F.3d 926 (2004)

Theodore MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF ARDMORE; Gary L. Henry, officially and in his individual capacity; Fraternal Order of Police Lodge # 108, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 28, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Batton, Norman, OK, for Appellant.

Stephen Brent Bahner, Fischl, Culp, McMillin, Chaffin, Bahner & Long, LLP, Ardmore, OK, for Appellee City of Ardmore; Stefan K. Doughty, Ass't Attorney General, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Appellee Gary Henry; and James Patrick Hunt, James R. Moore & Assocs., P.C., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Appellee Fraternal Order of Police.

Before HENRY, HOLLOWAY, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

HENRY, Circuit Judge.

Theodore Montgomery appears to have let his claims get away from him. He raises some eleven propositions, as nearly as we can tell, covering violations of procedural due process and various state tort claims. The defendants, unhelpfully unfamiliar with final order law, seek to challenge the preservation of Mr. Montgomery's appeal. One of them, the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) seeks attorneys fees. With the exception of one of Mr. Montgomery...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases