1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 384 F.3d
  5. 384 F.3d 901 (2004)
 

CITY OF CHICAGO v. COMCAST CABLE HOLDINGS

No. 03-3815.

384 F.3d 901 (2004)

CITY OF CHICAGO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMCAST CABLE HOLDINGS, L.L.C., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided October 1, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benna R. Solomom (argued), Jane E. Notz, Office of the Corporation Counsel, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Charles A. Rohe, Swidler Berlin Shereff Friedman, Washington, DC, D. Craig Martin, Kalamazoo, MI, Robert G. Scott (argued), Cole, Raywid & Braverman, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.

Michael S. Schooler, National Cable Television Asso., Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae.

Before EASTERBROOK, MANION, and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges.

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

Cable TV operators in Chicago have signed contracts promising to pay the City 5% of their gross revenues from any service, including what the parties call "cable modem service," furnished over the franchised cable. (We put the phrase in quotations because no modem is involved. A modem converts between analog and digital signals, while the service at issue here is digital throughout. But we follow common usage in applying the phrase "cable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases