The two actions are at completely different stages of discovery. Consolidation would result in undue delay in the resolution of the Cathers action (see Abrams v Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BARNES v. CATHERS
5 A.D.3d 122 (2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 895
BRUCE BARNES et al., Appellants, v. CATHERS AND DEMBROSKY et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 2, 2004.
March 2, 2004.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.