1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 680 N.W.2d
  5. 680 N.W.2d 574 (2004)
 

LORIX v. CROMPTON CORP.

No. A03-1518.

680 N.W.2d 574 (2004)

Diane LORIX, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Respondent, v. CROMPTON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants, Flexsys NV, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 2, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Garrett D. Blanchfield, Jr., Mark Reinhardt, Reinhardt Wendorf & Blanchfield, St. Paul, MN, for respondent.

William L. Greene, David R. Crosby, Leonard Street and Deinard, PA, Minneapolis, MN; and James D. Slear, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Washington, DC, for appellants.

Considered and decided by WRIGHT, Presiding Judge; SCHUMACHER, Judge; and WILLIS, Judge.

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

On appeal from a district court order denying appellants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, appellants argue that the district court erroneously concluded that it could exercise personal jurisdiction over appellants. Because we conclude that respondent has not shown sufficient contacts for the exercise of either specific or general jurisdiction, we reverse.

FACTS

Respondent Diane Lorix's amended...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases