1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 88 P.3d
  5. 88 P.3d 1165 (2004)
 

NORDSTROM, INC. v. MARICOPA COUNTY

No. 1 CA-TX 02-0021.

88 P.3d 1165 (2004)

207 Ariz. 553

NORDSTROM, INC., a corporation; Scottsdale Fashion Square Partnership, a partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department T.

April 29, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fennemore Craig, P.C. By Paul J. Mooney, Paul Moore, Phoenix, Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Helm & Kyle, Ltd. by Roberta S. Livesay, Tempe, Special Counsel for Defendant-Appellee.

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 Nordstrom, Inc. and Scottsdale Fashion Square Partnership ("SFSP") (collectively "Taxpayers") appeal the property tax valuations for the Nordstrom department store (the "Store") in Scottsdale Fashion Square for the 1999 and 2000 tax years. We hold that the Store is not a "shopping center" as defined in Arizona Revised Statutes ("A.R.S.") section 42-13201 (1999) for property tax valuation purposes. In addition, Maricopa County...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases