1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 687 N.W.2d
  5. 687 N.W.2d 554 (2004)
 

AT&T v. IOWA UTILITIES BD.

No. 03-0648.

687 N.W.2d 554 (2004)

AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MIDWEST, INC., Appellant, v. IOWA UTILITIES BOARD, Appellee, Coon Rapids Municipal Communications Utility; Laurens Municipal Broadband Communications Utility; FiberComm, L.C.; Forest City Telecom, Inc.; Heart of Iowa Communications, Inc.; Independent Networks, L.C.; Lost Nation-Elwood Telephone Company; Office of Consumer Advocate, a Division of The Iowa Department of Justice; Goldfield Access Network, L.C.; and Iowa Association of Municipal Utilities, Intervenors-Appellees.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

September 15, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Bendernagel and David M. Miles of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood L.L.P., Washington, D.C., and Richard W. Lozier, Jr. of Belin Lamson McCormick Zumbach Flynn, A P.C., Des Moines, for appellant.

David J. Lynch, Des Moines, for appellee Iowa Utilities Board.

Ivan T. Webber of Ahlers & Cooney, P.C., Des Moines, for intervenors-appellees Coon Rapids Municipal Communications Utility and Laurens Municipal Broadband Communications Utility.

Robert F. Holz, Jr. and Diane M. Stahle of Davis, Brown, Koehn, Shors & Roberts, P.C., Des Moines, for intervenors-appellees FiberComm, L.C.; Forest City Telecom, Inc.; Heart of Iowa Communications, Inc.; Independent Networks, L.C.; and Lost Nation-Elwood Telephone Company.

Dennis L. Puckett of Sullivan & Ward, P.C., Des Moines, for intervenor-appellee Goldfield Access Network, L.C.

Michael R. May, Ankeny, for intervenor-appellee Iowa Association of Municipal Utilities.

Jennifer Easler, Assistant Attorney General, Des Moines, for intervenor-appellee Office of Consumer Advocate.

PER CURIAM.

The district court, sitting in review of agency action, affirmed in part and reversed in part a decision of the Iowa Utilities Board (IUB) in this dispute among providers of telephone service. We agree with the district court that the IUB correctly held AT&T constructively ordered services from the "competitive local exchange carriers" (CLECs) and must pay the tariffed rates for past services. Although we disagree with the district court's ruling that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases