Petitioner's inconsistent testimony and the testimony of two Housing Authority employees associated with the building support the determination that petitioner is not entitled to succeed to the rights of the former tenant, his purported stepfather, with whom he shared the apartment. There is no substantial evidence that the management had actual or constructive notice of petitioner's residency in the subject apartment, or that he ever requested permission in writing to occupy...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
