1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 605 S.E.2d
  5. 605 S.E.2d 602 (2004)
 

VITO v. DHILLON

Nos. A04A2170, A04A2171.

605 S.E.2d 602 (2004)

269 Ga. App. 899

VITO et al. v. DHILLON et al. Dhillon et al. v. Vito et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Reconsideration Denied October 6, 2004.

Certiorari Denied February 7, 2005.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hall Booth Smith & Slover, James E. Looper, Jr., Atlanta, R. Anderson, Macon, for appellants.

Budd, Larner, Rosenbaum, Greenberg & Sade, Prescott L. Nottingham, Mark A. Inman, Atlanta, for appellees.

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

It is undisputed in this case that appellee-plaintiff Gurjit Dhillon, then five feet five inches tall, sought elective cosmetic surgery to increase his height. Paid $40,000, to podiatrist George R. Vito, D.P.M., who performed a limb-lengthening procedure1 on both of Mr. Dhillon's legs and feet, which were perfectly normal before undergoing the procedure. The surgery left one of Mr. Dhillon's legs shorter than the other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases