1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 374 F.3d
  5. 374 F.3d 825 (2004)
 

KHAN v. ASHCROFT

No. 02-73906.

374 F.3d 825 (2004)

Jamal KHAN, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed July 2, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin Resendez Guajardo, San Francisco, CA, for the petitioner.

Carol Federighi, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for the respondent.

Before ALARCÓN, BEEZER, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Jamal Khan petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") affirmance of an Immigration Judge's ("IJ") denial of his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. He claims that the notice he was given of his hearing was inadequate, and that a master calendar hearing was improper, because the notice and hearing were not translated into a language he understands and therefore violated due process. We have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases