M.L. BERRY, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
PHARMACIA CORPORATION f/k/a Monsanto Chemical Company, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 29, 2004.
September 29, 2004.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Paul A. Koerber, Roger K. Doolittle, Doolittle and Doolittle, Thomas R. Frazier, II, Frazier & Davidson, P.A., Jackson, MS, Felix Lee Bowie, III, Davidson, Bowie & Sims, PLLC, Flowood, MS, Mary E. McAlister, Douglas G. Mercier, David Nutt & Associates, Ridgeland, MS, Harold J. Barkley, Jr., Jackson, MS, F. Gerald Maples, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiffs.
Thomas W. Tyner, Daphne M. Lancaster, Aultman, Tyner, Ruffin & Yarborough, Ltd., Hattiesburg, MS, Jane E, Tucker, E. Clifton Hodge, Jr., James W. Craig, Tana Nicole Vollendorf, Phelps Dunbar, Katherine K. Smith, Watkins & Eager, David A. Baker, Forman, Perry, Watkins, Krutz & Tardy, Jackson, MS, Robert 0. Allen, Allen, Allen, Breeland & Allen, PLLC, Brookhaven, MS, Trudy D. Fisher, John Alexander Brunini, Brunini, Grantham, Grower & Hewes, Jackson, MS, John Max Edwards, Jr., Phelps Dunbar, Tupelo, MS, Robert W. Wilkinson, Dogan & Wilkinson, PLLC, Pascagoula, MS, Michael N. Watts, Mark R. Smith, Holcomb Dunbar, P.A., Oxford, MS, Thomas E. Vaughn, Allen, Vaughn, Cobb & Hood, Gulfport, MS, David A. Barfield, Barfield & Associates, Jackson, MS, Karl R. Steinberger, Williams, Heidelberg, Steinberger & McElhaney, PA, Pascagoula, MS, James P. Streetman, III, Scott, Sullivan, Streetman & Fox, PC, Walker W. Jones, III, James L. Jones, Scott W. Pedigo, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Jackson, MS, Charles Michael Evert, Jr., Rose Marie Wade, Evert & Weathersby, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Defendants.
United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TOM S. LEE, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on plaintiffs' motion for mandatory abstention or, in the alternative, for remand. Defendant Pharmacia Corporation f/k/a Monsanto Chemical Company has responded in opposition to the motion and the court, having considered the memoranda of authorities submitted by the parties, concludes that the motion should be denied.
This consolidated lawsuit, involving...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
