STENEKEN v. STENEKEN


843 A.2d 344 (2004)

367 N.J. Super. 427

Marilyn STENEKEN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Gary STENEKEN, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 15, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd M. Sahner, Roseland, argued the cause for appellant (Marcus, Brody, Kessler, Sahner & Weinstein, attorneys; Mr. Sahner, on the brief).

Bonnie C. Frost, Denville, argued the cause for respondent (Einhorn, Harris, Ascher, Barbarito, Frost & Ironson, attorneys; Ms. Frost, on the brief).

Before Judges HAVEY, PARRILLO and HOENS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PARRILLO, J.A.D.

In this matrimonial action, defendant Gary Steneken appeals from a February 24, 2003 order of the Family Part, after our remand, increasing alimony to $5,500 per month, $1,500 more than the amount originally set by the trial judge in the February 14, 2000 final judgment of divorce, and awarding plaintiff Marilyn Steneken counsel fees. The novel issue raised in this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases